Podcast Mention, Tapping Argument, and the true test: 2 students same night pull last night.
http://www.casanovacrew.com/Gudtimes/ep3.mp3 !!! Gudtimes and I met at the PUA World Summit and he’s made changes in his life after a few talks with me on facebook. Listen to the podcast to see what he says.
http://www.facebook.com/brett.i.segel ) tried to go up against me by saying that there was no way my argument was valid because there was no way I was a doctor. Better yet he said it was because “You don’t sound like a doctor.” Wow. Just because I don’t write journalspeak all the time he wrote me off. So which is worse, arguing based on the current science, or arguing by attacking the messenger. Brett. I’m a doctor. You are just a medical student. As a medical student you started misstating the science by saying peptide flow makes no sense because pheromones cause group cycling in women etc. Dude. Peptide hormones exist. Some pheromones are peptide hormones. All you did was prove my theory in your argumentative state. And look like a fool to all my hundreds of students and colleagues who know how good of a doctor I am and my reputation. It’s a basic lesson.
Comments are closed.